Columbia Body Manufacturing Co.; Receipt of Petition for Temporary Exemption From FMVSS No. 224 |
|---|
Topics: Columbia Body
|
Raymond R. Posten
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
December 17, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 242 (Thursday, December 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78817-78819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0125]
Columbia Body Manufacturing Co.; Receipt of Petition for
Temporary Exemption From FMVSS No. 224
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for temporary exemption from
FMVSS No. 224, Rear Impact Protection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with 49 CFR part 555, NHTSA seeks comments on a
petition for exemption from Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 224, Rear impact protection by Columbia Body Manufacturing
Co. (``Columbia Body'' or ``petitioner'') of Clackamas, Oregon.
Columbia Body is seeking a three year exemption from the standard,
asserting that compliance with the standard would cause substantial
economic hardship to a manufacturer that has tried in good faith to
comply with the standard. We are publishing this notice of receipt of
the application in accordance with our exemption regulations. This
action does not mean that we have made a judgment about the merits of
the application.
DATES: Comments on this petition must be submitted by January 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For legal questions, contact Mr. Ryan
Hagen, Office of the Chief Counsel, NCC-112, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 4th
Floor, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-2992; Fax: (202) 366-
3820. For technical questions, contact Mr. Robert Mazurowski, Office of
Crashworthiness Standards, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 4th Floor,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-1012; Fax: (202) 493-2990.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comment, identified by the docket number
in the heading of this document, by any of the following methods:
Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the electronic docket site by
clicking on ``Help and Information'' or ``Help/Info.''
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below. We
will consider all comments received before the close of business on the
comment closing date indicated above. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments filed after the closing date.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone: (202) 366-9826.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Confidential Business Information: If you wish to submit any
information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three
copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim
to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA,
at the address given under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In
addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business information, to the Docket at the address
given above. When you send a comment containing information claimed to
be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter
setting forth the information specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR part 512).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Statutory Authority for Temporary Exemptions
The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act),
codified at 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, provides the Secretary of
Transportation authority to exempt, on a temporary basis and under
specified circumstances, motor vehicles from a motor vehicle safety
standard or bumper standard. This authority is set forth at 49 U.S.C.
30113. The Secretary of Transportation has delegated the authority for
implementing this section to NHTSA.
In recognition of the more limited resources and capabilities of
small manufacturers, authority to grant exemptions based on substantial
economic hardship and good faith efforts is provided in the Safety Act
to enable the agency to give those manufacturers additional time to
comply with the Federal safety standards. The Safety Act authorizes the
Secretary to grant a temporary exemption to a manufacturer whose total
motor vehicle production in the most recent year of production is not
more than 10,000 motor vehicles, on such terms as the Secretary deems
appropriate, if the exemption would be consistent with the public
interest and the Safety Act and ``compliance with the standard would
cause substantial economic hardship to a manufacturer that has tried to
comply with the standard in good faith.'' (49 U.S.C. Sec.
30113(b)(3)(B)(i)).
NHTSA established 49 CFR part 555, Temporary Exemption from Motor
Vehicle Safety and Bumper Standards, to implement the statutory
provisions concerning temporary exemptions. Under Part 555, a
petitioner must provide specified information in submitting a petition
for exemption. These requirements are specified in 49 CFR 555.5, and
include a number of items. Foremost among them are that the petitioner
must set forth the basis of the application under Sec. 555.6, and the
reasons why the exemption would be in the public interest and
consistent with the objectives of the Safety Act (49
[[Page 78818]]
U.S.C. Chapter 301).\1\ A manufacturer is eligible to apply for a
hardship exemption if its total motor vehicle production in its most
recent year of production did not exceed 10,000 vehicles, as determined
by the NHTSA Administrator (49 U.S.C. 30113).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ While 49 U.S.C. 30113(b) states that exemptions from a
Safety Act standard are to be granted on a ``temporary basis,'' (49
U.S.C. 30113(b)(1)) the statute also expressly provides for renewal
of an exemption on reapplication. Manufacturers are nevertheless
cautioned that the agency's decision to grant an initial petition in
no way predetermines that the agency will repeatedly grant renewal
petitions, thereby imparting semi-permanent status to an exemption
from a safety standard. Exempted manufacturers seeking renewal must
bear in mind that the agency is directed to consider financial
hardship as but one factor, along with the manufacturer's ongoing
good faith efforts to comply with the regulation, the public
interest, consistency with the Safety Act, generally, as well as
other such matters provided in the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Rear Impact Protection
FMVSS No. 224, Rear impact protection,\2\ requires that all
trailers with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 4,536 kilograms
(kg) (10,000 pounds (lb)) or more be fitted with a rear impact guard
that conforms to FMVSS No. 223, Rear impact guards.\3\ This
requirement, however, has presented problems for certain specialized
vehicles, such as road construction vehicles where interaction between
the rear impact guard and the specialized paving or dumping equipment
can cause engineering challenges. In 2004, NHTSA finalized a rule that
excludes road construction controlled horizontal discharge semitrailers
(RCC horizontal discharge trailers), which discharge asphalt to a
paving machine by use of a mechanical drive and conveyor belt.\4\ In
that final rule, NHTSA concluded that the installation of rear impact
guards would interfere with the intended function of the trailers and
were impractical, given the design and mission of these trailers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 49 CFR 571.224.
\3\ 49 CFR 571.223.
\4\ 69 FR 67663 (November 19, 2004). Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2004/11/19/04-25703/federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standards-rear-impact-guards-final-rule (last
accessed on November 5, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2004 final rule decided against a regulatory exemption for
gravity feed dump trailers, which do not have the mechanical drive and
conveyor belt as discussed above, because gravity feed dump trailers
can be versatile vehicles used for a wide variety of tasks. Creating an
exemption in the regulation itself for gravity feed dump trailers could
potentially permit a large vehicle population with greater exposure
than RCC horizontal discharge trailers to be exempted from the
standard. Instead, NHTSA anticipated dealing with gravity feed dump
trailers through the exemption process.\5\ Prior to that final rule,
NHTSA had granted an exemption to gravity feed dump trailers
manufactured by Columbia Body.\6\ Since that final rule, NHTSA has
continued to grant exemptions to manufacturers of gravity feed dump
trailer manufacturers through the procedures in 49 CFR part 555.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id. at 67666.
\6\ 68 FR 7406 (February 13, 2003). Available at: http://www.regulations.gov/contentStreamer?documentId=NHTSA-2002-13955-0004&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf (last accessed on
November 6, 2015).
\7\ See: 69 FR 30989 (June 1, 2004), available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2004/06/01/04-12334/reliance-trailer-co-llc-grant-of-application-for-renewal-of-temporary-exemption-from-federal-motor (last accessed on November 6, 2015),
and 74 FR 42142 (August 20, 2009), available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2009/08/20/E9-19956/beall-corporation-grant-of-application-for-a-temporary-exemption-from-fmvss-no-224 (last accessed on November 9, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Overview of Columbia Body's Petition
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30113 and the procedures in 49 CFR
part 555, Columbia Body of Clackamas, Oregon, a trailer manufacturer,
has petitioned the agency for a three year temporary exemption from the
rear impact protection requirements in FMVSS No. 224 based on
substantial economic hardship.
Columbia Body is a small business that currently employs 40 full
time employees and has annual sales of $5-6,000,000. It produces two,
three, and four axle ``dump style'' trailers that use a hydraulic hoist
to raise the front end of the trailer and discharge its load through
the tailgate. Columbia Body has produced an average of 17 non-gravity
feed dump trailers a year over the last three years. Recently, many of
Columbia Body's gravity feed dump body competitors have gone bankrupt,
leading purchasers to request the trailers from Columbia Body. Given
the recent requests, Columbia Body seeks to ensure it is able to fill
any potential orders. If the exemption were granted, Columbia Body
projects that it would sell no more than 50 of the exempted trailers
per year. Columbia Body states that the trailers in question are
designed specifically for use with paving machines. Without an
exemption, Columbia Body states it will suffer substantial economic
hardship, projecting it will have to lay off seven or eight of its 40
employees starting in 2016.
In its application, Columbia Body provides specific financial
information from the last three years. In 2012, Columbia Body posted a
net loss of $108,000, followed by a $215,000 loss in 2013. In 2014, it
posted a net profit of $302,000. If an exemption is not granted,
Columbia Body projects it will post a $169,000 net profit for 2016, in
comparison to $1 million net profit if an exemption is granted.
Columbia Body states that it has put forth a good faith effort to
comply with FMVSS No. 224, however, is not possible for the company to
do so at a price, and with the utility its customers require.
Specifically, the rear end of the type of trailer in question
interfaces with the front end of an asphalt paving machine, dumping hot
asphalt into the paving machine's receiver. To establish this
connection, the paving machine hooks to the rear wheels of the dump
trailer. In order to prevent asphalt from spilling out while being
transferred from the dump trailer to the paving machine, the paving
machine fits 16 to 18 inches beneath the bottom of the dump trailer.
The interaction between the dump trailer and paving machine occurs in
the space where an underride guard would otherwise reside.
Columbia Body states that it has looked into possible solutions to
this problem, including $50,000 in research in 2005 and 2006 to
evaluate solutions to comply with FMVSS No. 224. One solution included
adding removable underride guards. Columbia Body states, however, that
``[e]ven if we could install a removable underride guard it will put
equipment operators in an unsafe situation installing and removing the
guard.'' The petitioner states that the area where a removable
underride guard would be installed is often covered in asphalt buildup.
Additionally, Columbia Body believes that the cleaning, maintenance,
and heavy impacts on the underride guard and the area immediately
around it when contacting the paving machine would affect the
structural integrity of the underride guard.
Another solution Columbia Body states it looked into involved
constructing a sub-frame ``with the ability to slide the dump body
forward when in transit and slide it to the rear to provide the proper
over hang [sic] when paving.'' Columbia Body states that although this
design is possible, conversations with prospective customers indicate
the design ``would not be acceptable'' because of the added cost and
weight associated with building such a structure.
Columbia Body states that so long as the paving industry continues
to use the same method of paving roads, it remains a physical
impossibility to manufacture
[[Page 78819]]
this type of trailer and comply with FMVSS No. 224.
In support of its petition for exemption, Columbia Body notes that
gravity feed dump trailers see limited highway exposure due to their
function. Specifically, the trailers themselves are on the road for
short periods of time. ``Asphalt batch plants are typically set close
to the paving activity to limit time traveling between the two paving
activities.'' Additionally, the petitioner states that in many
instances, these paving machines are often performing their transport
tasks away from the driving public in restricted access construction
areas.
Finally, Columbia Body believes its ability to obtain an exemption
is in the public interest. Columbia Body has informed NHTSA that
customers requesting its gravity feed dump trailers are doing so in
order to pave local roadways. Many purchasers are local municipalities,
or companies that support local municipalities in creating and
maintaining roads for the traveling public. Therefore, the petitioner
believes supplying gravity feed dump trailers is in the public
interest.
D. Completeness and Comment Period
Upon receiving a petition, NHTSA conducts an initial review of the
petition with respect to whether the petition is complete and whether
the petitioner appears to be eligible to apply for the requested
exemption. The agency has concluded that Columbia Body's petition is
complete and that it is eligible to apply for a temporary exemption.
The agency has not made any judgment on the merits of the application.
NHTSA has placed a non-confidential copy of the petition in the docket.
The agency seeks comment from the public on the merits of Columbia
Body's petition for a temporary exemption from FMVSS No. 224. After
considering public comments and other available information, we will
publish a notice of final action on the petition in the Federal
Register.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015-31709 Filed 12-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P