BMW of North America, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance |
|---|
Topics: 6 Series, 7 Series
|
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
June 6, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32815-32816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13181]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0146; Notice 1]
BMW of North America, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC, (BMW) a subsidiary of BMW AG in
Munich, Germany, has determined that certain model year (MY) 2014 BMW 7
series and 6 series vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph S5.2.1
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and
Displays. BMW has filed an appropriate report dated December 5, 2013
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility
and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is July 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: Logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
[[Page 32816]]
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. BMW's Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), BMW submitted a petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
This notice of receipt of BMW's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved
Affected are approximately 5,806 of the following MY 2014 BMW
vehicles:
2014 BMW 7 Series manufactured between July 1, 2013 and November 4,
2013,
2014 BMW 6 Series Coupe M Sport Edition manufactured between May 15,
2013 and October 29, 2013,
2014 BMW 6 Series Grand Coupe M Sport Edition manufactured between May
15, 2013 and July 30, 2013,
2014 BMW 6 Series Convertible M Sport Edition manufactured between
April 2, 2013 and October 29, 2013.
III. Noncompliance
BMW explains that while using in-vehicle controls and displays,
there is a possibility for the vehicle operator or front seat passenger
to enable the speedometer to display vehicle speed in units of miles-
per-hour (mph) or kilometers-per-hour (km/h). Since all vehicles sold
in the U.S. must display vehicle speeds in mph, or mph and km/h these
vehicles fail to fully meet the requirements set forth in paragraph
S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101.
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101 requires in pertinent part:
S5.2.1 Except for the Low Tire Pressure Telltale, each control,
telltale and indicator that is listed in column 1 of Table 1 or
Table 2 must be identified by the symbol specified for it in column
2 or the word or abbreviation specified for it in column 3 of Table
1 or Table 2 . . .
V. Summary of BMW's Analyses
BMW stated its belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
1. BMW states that the indicated vehicle speed in km/h is 1.6 times
greater than speed in mph. BMW believes that if a vehicle operator
changes the display to indicate km/h and later forgets that the change
had been made, the operator will clearly recognize that the vehicle is
moving at a lower speed than intended and adjust the vehicle speed to
match road and traffic conditions. Thus, signaling the operator (at the
next appropriate opportunity) to perform the necessary steps to adjust
the speedometer.
2. BMW also states that the vehicle's Owner Manual contains
information pertaining to the use of the iDrive controller to change
the units displayed within the ``Settings'' menu. Therefore, if a
vehicle operator needs to reconfigure the display to indicate mph,
instructions are available.
3. BMW further states that the vehicle's Owner Manual and Service
and Warranty Book contain the toll-free telephone number for BMW
Customer Relations. Additionally, the in-vehicle iDrive system offers
the vehicle operator a BMW Customer Relations menu option to directly
contact BMW Customer Relations via the embedded wireless communications
module. Therefore, if a vehicle operator notices that the speed is
incorrectly displayed in km/h and does not know how to reset the speed
to display in mph, e.g., as set by a prior operator, the vehicle
operator can easily contact BMW Customer Relations for assistance.
5. BMW is not aware of any contacts from vehicle operators
regarding this issue.
6. BMW is also not aware of any accidents or injuries that have
occurred as a result of this issue.
BMW has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 101.
In summation, BMW believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition, to exempt BMW from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that BMW no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve BMW
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant motor vehicles under their control after
BMW notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-13181 Filed 6-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P